poster

Creature (1985)

4.7 | May 08, 1985 (US) | Science Fiction, Horror | 01:37
Budget: 750 000 | Revenue: N/A

It's been sleeping peacefully on a moon of Saturn for 2000 centuries ... until now!

A crew of scientists arrives on a far, cold planet to examine archaic artifacts of unknown origin. They discover that their German enemies already have a ship there. When they seek their help after a failed landing, they only find the Germans’ bodies, obviously slaughtered by one of the archaic creatures, awoken to new life. Now the alien is after them.

Featured Crew

Director, Writer, Producer
Writer
Executive Producer
Original Music Composer
Original Music Composer
Special Effects
Director of Photography
Casting
Art Direction

Cast

profile
Stan Ivar
Mike Davison
profile
Wendy Schaal
Beth Sladen
profile
Lyman Ward
David Perkins
profile
Klaus Kinski
Hans Rudy Hofner
profile
Annette McCarthy
Dr. Wendy H. Oliver
profile
Marie Laurin
Susan Delambre
profile
Robert Jaffe
Jon Fennel
profile
Diane Salinger
Melanie Bryce
profile
John Stinson
Astronaut #1
profile
Buckley Norris
Concord Technician #1

Reviews

avatar
GenerationofSwine
6 | Jan 10, 2023
Yeah it's an Alien rip off and the monster isn't as good. But there are a few things that it actually did better, as far as the characters went. The big lacking is the, well... Ripley made the Alien movies and you didn't have someone like her to stand out, you had neither a strong male nor a strong female lead... you didn't have any strong leads at all, and that. Wendy Schaal did a respectable job for the intended intelligent scream queen, but given it's an alien rip off you didn't want her to be a scream queen, you wanted her to be bad@$$. And, for a standard horror movie scream queen she did a great job... just you didn't want that in a movie like this after Alien set the standard. It was Klaus Kinski that stole the show and, unfortunately, they didn't let it ride on his back. He could have carried it if they gave him a longer role. He was fun to watch. But ultimately it fails for weakness in characters and no real worthy lead. But it was still entertaining, so 10 stars because... movies are made to entertain.
avatar
Rocketeer Raccoon
6 | Mar 04, 2017
I notice that various people criticising the film for blatantly copying Alien but I say so what, for what it was I thought it was alright, I was never bored of the film and it did have an interesting plot. The film did make me laugh with how the doors sound in the film, the doors sounds like blaster firing from Star Wars so I thought that was definitely funny in a good way. However I did find two problems with this film, the first problem I found was that the Alien creature was very under-used, it didn't really appear much until the final act of the film so that was a wasted opportunity. The second problem is that the story and some scenes were a bit ropey, and there's some things I find a bit baffling in it but not to the point of being obnoxious. Even though people have discarded this film just because it's a low budget Alien clone but I say give it a chance because it's really not that bad.