poster

Foolish Wives (1922)

6.5 | Jan 11, 1922 (US) | Drama, Thriller | 02:23
Budget: 1 100 000 | Revenue: 400 200

A con artist masquerades as Russian nobility and attempts to seduce the wife of an American diplomat.

Featured Crew

Director, Writer, Scenario Writer
Director of Photography
Assistant Editor
Editor
Lighting Technician
Producer
Assistant Director
Assistant Editor
Editorial Coordinator

Cast

profile
Erich von Stroheim
Count Wladislaw Sergius Karamzin
profile
Rudolph Christians
Andrew J. Hughes
profile
Miss DuPont
Helen Hughes
profile
Maude George
Princess Olga Petchnikoff
profile
Mae Busch
Princess Vera Petchnikoff
profile
Dale Fuller
Maruschka
profile
Cesare Gravina
Cesare Ventucci
profile
Malvina Polo
Marietta
profile
Albert Edmondson
Pavel Pavlich
profile
Mary Philbin
Crippled Girl (uncredited)

Reviews

avatar
CinemaSerf
6 | Jul 06, 2022
It's a soap. Despite all the associated history of cuts, recuts and restoration it is still just a beautifully photographed soap opera. Erich von Stroheim did just about everything in this entertaining, if a little too cyclical, tale of a cad. That cad "Count Sergius Karanzim" (EVS) parades around the Côte D'Azur luring unsuspecting (wealthy) women to his rented villa in which he, with his two "cousins" (Maude George & Mae Busch as the Princesses "Petchnikoff") fleeces them relentlessly. For quite a while his charm, wit and guile provides them with a good living until he aims a little too high with the wife of an American diplomat in Monte Carlo. "Mrs. Hughes" (Miss Dupont) and her husband (Rudolph Christians) may well be about to put a spoke in the wheel of these confidence tricksters. It's good fun, this, with Von Stroheim eminently convincing as the con man and DuPont equally effective as his ditzy mark. The production is maybe a bit static, but at 100 years old, it is still delivered in a fashion that shows off the Mediterranean scenery whilst aiming one squarely between the eyes of the vacuous, riche, clientele who assumed their excesses of funds were adequate compensation for their gullibility, stupidity and naivety. It sags from time to time, so I am not hugely shocked that this original 21 reeler was scaled back somewhat. What we have here, though, still have flows well enough with succinct inter titles that are, at times, quite witty too. I am not sure I would ever bother to watch it again, but I am glad that I did. You can see here the template for so many films that followed.