poster

The Vagabond King (1956)

5.7 | Aug 28, 1956 (US) | Romance, Music, History | 01:26

Louis XI of France drafts Paris's popular "king" of criminals as Provost Marshal in his fight against usurper Charles of Burgundy and the traitorous nobles who rally around him.

Featured Crew

Director
Original Music Composer
Set Decoration
Stunts
Stunts
Screenplay
Makeup Supervisor
Director of Photography
Art Direction
Art Direction

Cast

profile
Kathryn Grayson
Catherine de Vaucelles
profile
Oreste Kirkop
François Villon (as Oreste)
profile
Rita Moreno
Huguette
profile
Walter Hampden
King Louis XI
profile
Leslie Nielsen
Thibault d'Aussigny
profile
William Prince
Rene de Montigny
profile
Jack Lord
Ferrebouc
profile
Gavin Gordon
Majordomo
profile
Ralph Clanton
Duke of Anjou

Reviews

avatar
CinemaSerf
6 | Feb 10, 2023
I'd love to have been a fly on the wall at the production meeting when Michael Curtiz and Pat Duggan came up with this concept - a sort of "Camelot" meets "Quentin Durward" musical effort that is not as bad as you might think! We have here a lavish looking historical melodrama featuring Maltese tenor Oreste Kirkop as "Villon", a popular fellow amongst the people who is elected "King of the Vagabonds". Meantime the real King, Louis XI (Walter Hampden), advised by his sagely counsellor "Tristan" (Sir Cedric Hardwicke with hair!) must battle the potential usurper Duke of Burgundy (Tom Duggan) and his rather foppish sidekick "Thibault" (Leslie Nielsen). The action is interspersed by quite frequent little arias that demonstrate that our street-wise hero most certainly has a great voice; limited only by a rather poor libretto - there are only so many things that rhyme with Burgundy. The action scenes provide for plenty of colourful costumes, swash and buckle and it's decently paced with plenty of familiar faces - Jack Lord, Rita Moreno and a rather under-utilised Kathryn Grayson to prop it up nicely. Though it isn't anywhere near as good as "If I Were KIng" (1938) upon which it appears to be based, money has been spent here and it looks good even if the writing and dialogue are poor and many of the scenes pretty heavily staged. Don't write it off, though - if you like the genre then it is still worth a watch, and there's no sign of Howard Keel!